Mike Boyle writes about the importance of practical, real-life defensive training for personal defense, especially when an assailant is close, in poor lighting, and the action is fast-paced. He emphasizes that training should involve responding decisively to threats within conversational distance. Data from law enforcement agencies like the FBI, DEA, and NYPD reveals that most armed conflicts, even for responsible citizens, occur at close range. This data underscores the necessity of being ready not only for anticipated threats but also for unexpected and atypical confrontational situations.
Boyle documents his study of police gunfight statistics and the conclusions he draws regarding the commonality of close-range incidents. He refers to reports in publications like The American Rifleman that illustrate scenarios where civilians have used firearms in self-defense, primarily against assailants at close quarters. The article argues that while it’s beneficial to avoid dangerous situations, it’s crucial to prepare for unexpected conditions where conventional norms don’t apply. He illustrates his point with real-life accounts of police officers using handguns effectively at longer distances.
He goes on to highlight the balance between training at typical combat range and long-range proficiency shooting. This includes the importance of mastering grip, aiming, and trigger control to make precise long-distance shots, which could be required in a range of scenarios from an unusual distance like an unexpectedly long grocery aisle. Mike Boyle suggests that even small handguns wielded with proficiency can be effective via supportive stances like kneeling or prone positions to improve shot stability. Balancing close and long-range practice is part of a comprehensive training regime that covers various potential defense scenarios.
For more detailed insights, you can read the full article entitled "The EDC Shot You’re NOT Prepared to Take - The Armory Life."
No comments:
Post a Comment